Libya vs Norway: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 40-44 with secondary
Libya
15.9%
in 2010
Norway
15.2%
in 2010
Libya rank
48th
Norway rank
51st
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 40-44 with secondary over time
- Libya
- Norway
How they compare
Libya currently reports 15.9% against 15.2% in Norway, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Norway ahead.
Libya ranks 48th and Norway ranks 51st of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0% | 10.3% | 10.3% | Norway |
| 1970s | 0.1% | 11.1% | 11.0% | Norway |
| 1980s | 0.6% | 13.2% | 12.6% | Norway |
| 1990s | 2.4% | 17.2% | 14.8% | Norway |
| 2000s | 7.7% | 21.2% | 13.5% | Norway |
| 2010s | 15.9% | 15.2% | 0.6% | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 40-44 with secondary, Libya or Norway?
- Libya, at 15.9% against 15.2% in Norway as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 40-44 with secondary between Libya and Norway?
- 0.7%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Norway?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Libya and Norway rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 40-44 with secondary?
- Libya ranks 48th and Norway ranks 51st of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 40-44 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.