Libya vs New Zealand: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 40-44 with secondary
Libya
15.9%
in 2010
New Zealand
15.5%
in 2010
Libya rank
48th
New Zealand rank
50th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 40-44 with secondary over time
- Libya
- New Zealand
How they compare
Libya currently reports 15.9% against 15.5% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 48th and New Zealand ranks 50th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0% | 10.8% | 10.8% | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 0.1% | 38.4% | 38.3% | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 0.6% | 22.8% | 22.2% | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 2.4% | 10.1% | 7.8% | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 7.7% | 11.8% | 4.1% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 15.9% | 15.5% | 0.4% | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 40-44 with secondary, Libya or New Zealand?
- Libya, at 15.9% against 15.5% in New Zealand as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 40-44 with secondary between Libya and New Zealand?
- 0.4%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and New Zealand?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Libya and New Zealand rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 40-44 with secondary?
- Libya ranks 48th and New Zealand ranks 50th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 40-44 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.