Norway vs Philippines: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary
Norway
18.5%
in 2010
Philippines
17.6%
in 2010
Norway rank
7th
Philippines rank
8th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary over time
- Norway
- Philippines
How they compare
Norway currently reports 18.5% against 17.6% in Philippines, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Philippines ahead.
Norway ranks 7th and Philippines ranks 8th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 4 and Philippines in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.2% | 1.8% | 0.6% | Philippines |
| 1970s | 6.7% | 2.5% | 4.1% | Norway |
| 1980s | 12.1% | 6.2% | 5.9% | Norway |
| 1990s | 12.7% | 11.9% | 0.9% | Norway |
| 2000s | 15.2% | 16.6% | 1.4% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 18.5% | 17.6% | 0.9% | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary, Norway or Philippines?
- Norway, at 18.5% against 17.6% in Philippines as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary between Norway and Philippines?
- 0.9%, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Norway and Philippines rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary?
- Norway ranks 7th and Philippines ranks 8th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.