Colombia vs Latvia: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary
Colombia
5.3%
in 2010
Latvia
5.8%
in 2010
Colombia rank
61st
Latvia rank
58th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary over time
- Colombia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 5.8% against 5.3% in Colombia, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Colombia's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Colombia ranks 61st and Latvia ranks 58th of 144 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1% | 2.4% | 2.3% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 0.3% | 4.3% | 4.0% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 0.8% | 5.4% | 4.6% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 2.3% | 6.2% | 3.9% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 2.8% | 6.7% | 3.8% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 5.3% | 5.8% | 0.5% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary, Colombia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 5.8% against 5.3% in Colombia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary between Colombia and Latvia?
- 0.5%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Colombia and Latvia rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary?
- Colombia ranks 61st and Latvia ranks 58th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.