Chile vs Luxembourg: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary
Chile
12.7%
in 2010
Luxembourg
12.8%
in 2010
Chile rank
24th
Luxembourg rank
23rd
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary over time
- Chile
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 12.8% against 12.7% in Chile, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 24th and Luxembourg ranks 23rd of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Luxembourg in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.0% | 1.1% | 0.1% | Luxembourg |
| 1970s | 2.0% | 2.5% | 0.6% | Luxembourg |
| 1980s | 5.3% | 4.4% | 0.9% | Chile |
| 1990s | 7.0% | 5.2% | 1.8% | Chile |
| 2000s | 14.6% | 8.0% | 6.6% | Chile |
| 2010s | 12.7% | 12.8% | 0.1% | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary, Chile or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 12.8% against 12.7% in Chile as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary between Chile and Luxembourg?
- 0.1%, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Luxembourg?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Chile and Luxembourg rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary?
- Chile ranks 24th and Luxembourg ranks 23rd of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.