Chile vs Lithuania: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary
Chile
12.7%
in 2010
Lithuania
12.1%
in 2010
Chile rank
24th
Lithuania rank
26th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary over time
- Chile
- Lithuania
How they compare
Chile currently reports 12.7% against 12.1% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 24th and Lithuania ranks 26th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.0% | 1.5% | 0.5% | Lithuania |
| 1970s | 2.0% | 3.4% | 1.5% | Lithuania |
| 1980s | 5.3% | 5.2% | 0.2% | Chile |
| 1990s | 7.0% | 6.3% | 0.7% | Chile |
| 2000s | 14.6% | 8.4% | 6.3% | Chile |
| 2010s | 12.7% | 12.1% | 0.6% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary, Chile or Lithuania?
- Chile, at 12.7% against 12.1% in Lithuania as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary between Chile and Lithuania?
- 0.6%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Lithuania?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Chile and Lithuania rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary?
- Chile ranks 24th and Lithuania ranks 26th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.