Philippines vs Portugal: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary
Philippines
18.6%
in 2010
Portugal
19.4%
in 2010
Philippines rank
35th
Portugal rank
33rd
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary over time
- Philippines
- Portugal
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 19.4% against 18.6% in Philippines, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Philippines ahead.
Philippines ranks 35th and Portugal ranks 33rd of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 5 and Portugal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.0% | 2.6% | 1.4% | Philippines |
| 1970s | 5.6% | 3.5% | 2.2% | Philippines |
| 1980s | 8.6% | 6.4% | 2.1% | Philippines |
| 1990s | 11.9% | 8.9% | 3.0% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 14.0% | 13.3% | 0.7% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 18.6% | 19.4% | 0.8% | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary, Philippines or Portugal?
- Portugal, at 19.4% against 18.6% in Philippines as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary between Philippines and Portugal?
- 0.8%, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Portugal?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Philippines and Portugal rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary?
- Philippines ranks 35th and Portugal ranks 33rd of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.