Libya vs Philippines: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary
Libya
19.1%
in 2010
Philippines
18.6%
in 2010
Libya rank
34th
Philippines rank
35th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary over time
- Libya
- Philippines
How they compare
Libya currently reports 19.1% against 18.6% in Philippines, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Philippines ahead.
Libya ranks 34th and Philippines ranks 35th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0% | 4.0% | 4.0% | Philippines |
| 1970s | 0.2% | 5.6% | 5.5% | Philippines |
| 1980s | 1.0% | 8.6% | 7.5% | Philippines |
| 1990s | 3.8% | 11.9% | 8.1% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 13.7% | 14.0% | 0.3% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 19.1% | 18.6% | 0.6% | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary, Libya or Philippines?
- Libya, at 19.1% against 18.6% in Philippines as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary between Libya and Philippines?
- 0.5%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Libya and Philippines rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary?
- Libya ranks 34th and Philippines ranks 35th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.