Ghana vs Latvia: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary
Ghana
34.5%
in 2010
Latvia
34.3%
in 2010
Ghana rank
11th
Latvia rank
12th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary over time
- Ghana
- Latvia
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 34.5% against 34.3% in Latvia, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latvia ahead.
Ghana ranks 11th and Latvia ranks 12th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.2% | 14.8% | 13.6% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 7.4% | 23.1% | 15.6% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 15.5% | 30.2% | 14.7% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 28.3% | 34.1% | 5.7% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 32.3% | 35.8% | 3.6% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 34.5% | 34.3% | 0.2% | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary, Ghana or Latvia?
- Ghana, at 34.5% against 34.3% in Latvia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary between Ghana and Latvia?
- 0.2%, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Ghana and Latvia rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary?
- Ghana ranks 11th and Latvia ranks 12th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.