Congo vs Zimbabwe: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary
Congo
58.5%
in 2010
Zimbabwe
59.2%
in 2010
Congo rank
4th
Zimbabwe rank
3rd
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary over time
- Congo
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 59.2% against 58.5% in Congo, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Congo ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 3rd of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3% | 0.8% | 0.5% | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 0.5% | 1.5% | 1.0% | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 4.3% | 4.0% | 0.3% | Congo |
| 1990s | 19.8% | 10.8% | 9.0% | Congo |
| 2000s | 48.4% | 39.3% | 9.0% | Congo |
| 2010s | 58.5% | 59.2% | 0.7% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary, Congo or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 59.2% against 58.5% in Congo as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary between Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 0.7%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary?
- Congo ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 3rd of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.