Chile vs Uruguay: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary
Chile
25.2%
in 2010
Uruguay
24.5%
in 2010
Chile rank
23rd
Uruguay rank
24th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary over time
- Chile
- Uruguay
How they compare
Chile currently reports 25.2% against 24.5% in Uruguay, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 23rd and Uruguay ranks 24th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 12.0% | 7.2% | 4.7% | Chile |
| 1970s | 13.6% | 10.0% | 3.6% | Chile |
| 1980s | 12.7% | 16.0% | 3.3% | Uruguay |
| 1990s | 14.3% | 25.1% | 10.8% | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 15.9% | 29.7% | 13.8% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 25.2% | 24.5% | 0.8% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary, Chile or Uruguay?
- Chile, at 25.2% against 24.5% in Uruguay as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary between Chile and Uruguay?
- 0.7%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uruguay?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Chile and Uruguay rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary?
- Chile ranks 23rd and Uruguay ranks 24th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.