Australia vs Philippines: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary
Australia
17.9%
in 2010
Philippines
18.6%
in 2010
Australia rank
38th
Philippines rank
35th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary over time
- Australia
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 18.6% against 17.9% in Australia, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 38th and Philippines ranks 35th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Philippines in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 29.5% | 4.0% | 25.4% | Australia |
| 1970s | 21.6% | 5.6% | 15.9% | Australia |
| 1980s | 13.2% | 8.6% | 4.6% | Australia |
| 1990s | 4.7% | 11.9% | 7.1% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 2.5% | 14.0% | 11.5% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 17.9% | 18.6% | 0.7% | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary, Australia or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 18.6% against 17.9% in Australia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary between Australia and Philippines?
- 0.7%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Australia and Philippines rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary?
- Australia ranks 38th and Philippines ranks 35th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.