New Zealand vs Philippines: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with primary
New Zealand
6.7%
in 2010
Philippines
6.5%
in 2010
New Zealand rank
53rd
Philippines rank
56th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with primary over time
- New Zealand
- Philippines
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 6.7% against 6.5% in Philippines, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Philippines ahead.
New Zealand ranks 53rd and Philippines ranks 56th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.4% | 37.4% | 29.0% | Philippines |
| 1970s | 3.6% | 41.3% | 37.7% | Philippines |
| 1980s | 6.1% | 29.4% | 23.3% | Philippines |
| 1990s | 7.5% | 20.3% | 12.8% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 5.0% | 12.4% | 7.3% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 6.7% | 6.5% | 0.2% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with primary, New Zealand or Philippines?
- New Zealand, at 6.7% against 6.5% in Philippines as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with primary between New Zealand and Philippines?
- 0.2%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do New Zealand and Philippines rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with primary?
- New Zealand ranks 53rd and Philippines ranks 56th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with primary schooling. Incompleted Primary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.