Libya vs Norway: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with primary
Libya
0.0%
in 2010
Norway
0.0%
in 2010
Libya rank
133rd
Norway rank
130th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with primary over time
- Libya
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Libya, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 133rd and Norway ranks 130th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 5 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.8% | Libya |
| 1970s | 1.8% | 0.0% | 1.8% | Libya |
| 1980s | 6.4% | 0.1% | 6.3% | Libya |
| 1990s | 12.6% | 0.2% | 12.4% | Libya |
| 2000s | 10.5% | 0.1% | 10.4% | Libya |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with primary, Libya or Norway?
- Norway, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Libya as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with primary between Libya and Norway?
- 0.0%, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Norway?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Libya and Norway rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with primary?
- Libya ranks 133rd and Norway ranks 130th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with primary schooling. Incompleted Primary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.