Chile vs Liberia: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with primary
Chile
5.2%
in 2010
Liberia
5.2%
in 2010
Chile rank
64th
Liberia rank
63rd
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with primary over time
- Chile
- Liberia
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 5.2% against 5.2% in Chile, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 64th and Liberia ranks 63rd of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and Liberia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 33.0% | 1.0% | 32.1% | Chile |
| 1970s | 36.6% | 1.1% | 35.4% | Chile |
| 1980s | 27.3% | 1.0% | 26.3% | Chile |
| 1990s | 16.1% | 2.5% | 13.6% | Chile |
| 2000s | 11.0% | 4.1% | 6.8% | Chile |
| 2010s | 5.2% | 5.2% | 0.0% | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with primary, Chile or Liberia?
- Liberia, at 5.2% against 5.2% in Chile as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with primary between Chile and Liberia?
- 0.0%, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Liberia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Chile and Liberia rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 35-39 with primary?
- Chile ranks 64th and Liberia ranks 63rd of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 35-39 with primary schooling. Incompleted Primary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.