Hong Kong, China vs Latvia: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 30-34 with tertiary
Hong Kong, China
3.5%
in 2010
Latvia
3.9%
in 2010
Hong Kong, China rank
81st
Latvia rank
79th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 30-34 with tertiary over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 3.9% against 3.5% in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong, China's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 81st and Latvia ranks 79th of 144 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.8% | 3.9% | 2.1% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 1.6% | 5.9% | 4.3% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 4.1% | 7.4% | 3.4% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 4.5% | 7.6% | 3.1% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 4.3% | 7.4% | 3.1% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 3.5% | 3.9% | 0.4% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 30-34 with tertiary, Hong Kong, China or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 3.9% against 3.5% in Hong Kong, China as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 30-34 with tertiary between Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
- 0.4%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Latvia rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 30-34 with tertiary?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 81st and Latvia ranks 79th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 30-34 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.