Latvia vs Philippines: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 25-29 with secondary
Latvia
19.6%
in 2010
Philippines
20.6%
in 2010
Latvia rank
37th
Philippines rank
34th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 25-29 with secondary over time
- Latvia
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 20.6% against 19.6% in Latvia, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 37th and Philippines ranks 34th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 5 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 22.4% | 5.8% | 16.6% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 30.9% | 8.0% | 22.9% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 34.5% | 12.2% | 22.3% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 35.0% | 15.2% | 19.8% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 34.7% | 16.7% | 18.0% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 19.6% | 20.6% | 1.0% | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 25-29 with secondary, Latvia or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 20.6% against 19.6% in Latvia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 25-29 with secondary between Latvia and Philippines?
- 1.0%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Philippines rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 25-29 with secondary?
- Latvia ranks 37th and Philippines ranks 34th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 25-29 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.