Latvia vs Nicaragua: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 20-24 with secondary
Latvia
18.2%
in 2010
Nicaragua
19.5%
in 2010
Latvia rank
45th
Nicaragua rank
43rd
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 20-24 with secondary over time
- Latvia
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 19.5% against 18.2% in Latvia, a difference of 1.3%.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 45th and Nicaragua ranks 43rd of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 5 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 26.5% | 2.1% | 24.4% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 33.9% | 2.8% | 31.1% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 35.2% | 5.2% | 30.0% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 35.2% | 14.4% | 20.8% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 27.0% | 16.6% | 10.4% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 18.2% | 19.5% | 1.2% | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 20-24 with secondary, Latvia or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 19.5% against 18.2% in Latvia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 20-24 with secondary between Latvia and Nicaragua?
- 1.3%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Nicaragua?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Nicaragua rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 20-24 with secondary?
- Latvia ranks 45th and Nicaragua ranks 43rd of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 20-24 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.