Lithuania vs Philippines: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 15-19 with secondary
Lithuania
48.2%
in 2010
Philippines
49.5%
in 2010
Lithuania rank
63rd
Philippines rank
61st
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 15-19 with secondary over time
- Lithuania
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 49.5% against 48.2% in Lithuania, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 63rd and Philippines ranks 61st of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 5 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 52.4% | 14.9% | 37.5% | Lithuania |
| 1970s | 62.5% | 24.4% | 38.2% | Lithuania |
| 1980s | 65.9% | 32.3% | 33.6% | Lithuania |
| 1990s | 71.6% | 37.5% | 34.1% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 47.3% | 42.3% | 5.0% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 48.2% | 49.5% | 1.4% | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 15-19 with secondary, Lithuania or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 49.5% against 48.2% in Lithuania as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 15-19 with secondary between Lithuania and Philippines?
- 1.3%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Lithuania and Philippines rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 15-19 with secondary?
- Lithuania ranks 63rd and Philippines ranks 61st of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 15-19 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.