Latvia vs Netherlands: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 15-19 with secondary
Latvia
60.2%
in 2010
Netherlands
59.5%
in 2010
Latvia rank
32nd
Netherlands rank
33rd
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 15-19 with secondary over time
- Latvia
- Netherlands
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 60.2% against 59.5% in Netherlands, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Netherlands ahead.
Latvia ranks 32nd and Netherlands ranks 33rd of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Netherlands in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.3% | 29.0% | 19.7% | Netherlands |
| 1970s | 16.2% | 74.0% | 57.8% | Netherlands |
| 1980s | 20.6% | 58.2% | 37.5% | Netherlands |
| 1990s | 31.8% | 48.1% | 16.4% | Netherlands |
| 2000s | 61.2% | 55.1% | 6.1% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 60.2% | 59.5% | 0.7% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 15-19 with secondary, Latvia or Netherlands?
- Latvia, at 60.2% against 59.5% in Netherlands as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 15-19 with secondary between Latvia and Netherlands?
- 0.7%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Netherlands?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Netherlands rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 15-19 with secondary?
- Latvia ranks 32nd and Netherlands ranks 33rd of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 15-19 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.