Latvia vs Malta: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 15-19 with secondary
Latvia
60.2%
in 2010
Malta
60.8%
in 2010
Latvia rank
32nd
Malta rank
31st
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 15-19 with secondary over time
- Latvia
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 60.8% against 60.2% in Latvia, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Malta ahead.
Latvia ranks 32nd and Malta ranks 31st of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.3% | 23.9% | 14.6% | Malta |
| 1970s | 16.2% | 36.5% | 20.3% | Malta |
| 1980s | 20.6% | 47.9% | 27.3% | Malta |
| 1990s | 31.8% | 34.6% | 2.8% | Malta |
| 2000s | 61.2% | 55.3% | 5.8% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 60.2% | 60.8% | 0.6% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 15-19 with secondary, Latvia or Malta?
- Malta, at 60.8% against 60.2% in Latvia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 15-19 with secondary between Latvia and Malta?
- 0.6%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Malta?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Malta rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 15-19 with secondary?
- Latvia ranks 32nd and Malta ranks 31st of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 15-19 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.