Libya vs New Zealand: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 15-19 with primary
Libya
0.0%
in 2010
New Zealand
0.0%
in 2010
Libya rank
117th
New Zealand rank
114th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 15-19 with primary over time
- Libya
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Libya, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was New Zealand ahead.
Libya ranks 117th and New Zealand ranks 114th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.7% | 2.6% | 3.2% | Libya |
| 1970s | 20.0% | 0.0% | 20.0% | Libya |
| 1980s | 21.9% | 2.1% | 19.8% | Libya |
| 1990s | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.2% | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.2% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 15-19 with primary, Libya or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Libya as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 15-19 with primary between Libya and New Zealand?
- 0.0%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and New Zealand?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Libya and New Zealand rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 15-19 with primary?
- Libya ranks 117th and New Zealand ranks 114th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 15-19 with primary schooling. Incomplete primary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.