Chile vs South Africa: Average weekly working hours, aged 15-64, urban
Chile
42.71
in 2017
South Africa
42.2
in 2020
Chile rank
29th
South Africa rank
31st
Average weekly working hours, aged 15-64, urban over time
- Chile
- South Africa
How they compare
Chile currently reports 42.71 against 42.2 in South Africa, a difference of 0.51.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 29th and South Africa ranks 31st of 76 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.44 | 44.76 | 0.3207 | South Africa |
| 2010s | 42.86 | 43.68 | 0.8196 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average weekly working hours, aged 15-64, urban, Chile or South Africa?
- Chile, at 42.71 against 42.2 in South Africa as of 2017.
- What is the difference in average weekly working hours, aged 15-64, urban between Chile and South Africa?
- 0.51, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Chile and South Africa rank globally for average weekly working hours, aged 15-64, urban?
- Chile ranks 29th and South Africa ranks 31st of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Average weekly working hours, aged 15-64, urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.