Mauritius vs Nepal: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Mauritius
420.18 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Nepal
408.4 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Mauritius rank
44th
Nepal rank
46th

Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Mauritius
  • Nepal
0100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 420.18 kilograms per year per capita against 408.4 kilograms per year per capita in Nepal, a difference of 11.78 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 44th and Nepal ranks 46th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 4 and Nepal in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 93.52 kilograms per year per capita 27.91 kilograms per year per capita 65.62 kilograms per year per capita Mauritius
1970s 72.19 kilograms per year per capita 51.73 kilograms per year per capita 20.47 kilograms per year per capita Mauritius
1980s 82.27 kilograms per year per capita 102.52 kilograms per year per capita 20.25 kilograms per year per capita Nepal
1990s 164.96 kilograms per year per capita 138.52 kilograms per year per capita 26.45 kilograms per year per capita Mauritius
2000s 206.36 kilograms per year per capita 204.43 kilograms per year per capita 1.92 kilograms per year per capita Mauritius
2010s 280.84 kilograms per year per capita 343.71 kilograms per year per capita 62.87 kilograms per year per capita Nepal
2020s 356.88 kilograms per year per capita 393.57 kilograms per year per capita 36.7 kilograms per year per capita Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Mauritius or Nepal?
Mauritius, at 420.18 kilograms per year per capita against 408.4 kilograms per year per capita in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Mauritius and Nepal?
11.78 kilograms per year per capita, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Nepal rank globally for average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Mauritius ranks 44th and Nepal ranks 46th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Nepal: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/mauritius/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/mauritius/nepal/">Mauritius vs Nepal: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.