Mauritania vs Rwanda: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Mauritania
125.19 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Rwanda
124.78 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Mauritania rank
148th
Rwanda rank
149th

Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Mauritania
  • Rwanda
050100150200196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 125.19 kilograms per year per capita against 124.78 kilograms per year per capita in Rwanda, a difference of 0.41 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Mauritania ranks 148th and Rwanda ranks 149th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 9.57 kilograms per year per capita 78.34 kilograms per year per capita 68.77 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
1970s 12.22 kilograms per year per capita 76.57 kilograms per year per capita 64.35 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
1980s 29.52 kilograms per year per capita 59.33 kilograms per year per capita 29.81 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
1990s 28.03 kilograms per year per capita 60.36 kilograms per year per capita 32.34 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
2000s 50.85 kilograms per year per capita 104.54 kilograms per year per capita 53.69 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
2010s 120.79 kilograms per year per capita 135.17 kilograms per year per capita 14.38 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
2020s 156.12 kilograms per year per capita 127.92 kilograms per year per capita 28.21 kilograms per year per capita Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Mauritania or Rwanda?
Mauritania, at 125.19 kilograms per year per capita against 124.78 kilograms per year per capita in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Mauritania and Rwanda?
0.41 kilograms per year per capita, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Rwanda rank globally for average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Mauritania ranks 148th and Rwanda ranks 149th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Rwanda: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/mauritania/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/mauritania/rwanda/">Mauritania vs Rwanda: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.