Malaysia vs Nigeria: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Malaysia
177.83 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Nigeria
178.4 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Malaysia rank
128th
Nigeria rank
126th

Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Malaysia
  • Nigeria
50100150200196119922023

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 178.4 kilograms per year per capita against 177.83 kilograms per year per capita in Malaysia, a difference of 0.57 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nigeria ahead.

Malaysia ranks 128th and Nigeria ranks 126th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 2 and Nigeria in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Nigeria Difference Ahead
1960s 61.15 kilograms per year per capita 130.91 kilograms per year per capita 69.76 kilograms per year per capita Nigeria
1970s 70.92 kilograms per year per capita 124.41 kilograms per year per capita 53.49 kilograms per year per capita Nigeria
1980s 68.92 kilograms per year per capita 110.28 kilograms per year per capita 41.36 kilograms per year per capita Nigeria
1990s 87.56 kilograms per year per capita 141.85 kilograms per year per capita 54.3 kilograms per year per capita Nigeria
2000s 118.42 kilograms per year per capita 175.77 kilograms per year per capita 57.35 kilograms per year per capita Nigeria
2010s 186.84 kilograms per year per capita 186.16 kilograms per year per capita 0.6767 kilograms per year per capita Malaysia
2020s 187.93 kilograms per year per capita 179.65 kilograms per year per capita 8.28 kilograms per year per capita Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Malaysia or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 178.4 kilograms per year per capita against 177.83 kilograms per year per capita in Malaysia as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Malaysia and Nigeria?
0.57 kilograms per year per capita, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Nigeria?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malaysia and Nigeria rank globally for average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Malaysia ranks 128th and Nigeria ranks 126th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Nigeria: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/malaysia/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/malaysia/nigeria/">Malaysia vs Nigeria: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.