Gambia vs Lesotho: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Gambia
79.84 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Lesotho
85.3 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Gambia rank
174th
Lesotho rank
171st

Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Gambia
  • Lesotho
50100150196119922023

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 85.3 kilograms per year per capita against 79.84 kilograms per year per capita in Gambia, a difference of 5.46 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.1 times Gambia's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.

Gambia ranks 174th and Lesotho ranks 171st of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 4 and Lesotho in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Lesotho Difference Ahead
1960s 33.27 kilograms per year per capita 46.59 kilograms per year per capita 13.32 kilograms per year per capita Lesotho
1970s 30.44 kilograms per year per capita 48.3 kilograms per year per capita 17.87 kilograms per year per capita Lesotho
1980s 36.6 kilograms per year per capita 55.83 kilograms per year per capita 19.23 kilograms per year per capita Lesotho
1990s 76.11 kilograms per year per capita 61.2 kilograms per year per capita 14.91 kilograms per year per capita Gambia
2000s 78.29 kilograms per year per capita 57.29 kilograms per year per capita 21 kilograms per year per capita Gambia
2010s 115.78 kilograms per year per capita 72.62 kilograms per year per capita 43.16 kilograms per year per capita Gambia
2020s 93.79 kilograms per year per capita 73.41 kilograms per year per capita 20.38 kilograms per year per capita Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Gambia or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 85.3 kilograms per year per capita against 79.84 kilograms per year per capita in Gambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Gambia and Lesotho?
5.46 kilograms per year per capita, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Lesotho?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Lesotho rank globally for average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Gambia ranks 174th and Lesotho ranks 171st of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Lesotho: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/gambia-the/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/gambia-the/lesotho/">Gambia vs Lesotho: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.