Ecuador vs Namibia: Average per capita vegetable intake vs minimum recommended guidelines
Ecuador
64.8
in 2023
Namibia
68.77
in 2023
Ecuador rank
179th
Namibia rank
178th
Average per capita vegetable intake vs minimum recommended guidelines over time
- Ecuador
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 68.77 against 64.8 in Ecuador, a difference of 3.97.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 179th and Namibia ranks 178th of 192 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 165.98 | 70.08 | 95.91 | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 86.15 | 70.02 | 16.13 | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 79.17 | 60.1 | 19.08 | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 69.81 | 52.82 | 17 | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 59.62 | 69.57 | 9.95 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 66.2 | 103.38 | 37.18 | Namibia |
| 2020s | 62.61 | 80.08 | 17.47 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average per capita vegetable intake vs minimum recommended guidelines, Ecuador or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 68.77 against 64.8 in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average per capita vegetable intake vs minimum recommended guidelines between Ecuador and Namibia?
- 3.97, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for average per capita vegetable intake vs minimum recommended guidelines?
- Ecuador ranks 179th and Namibia ranks 178th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Average per capita vegetable intake vs minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.