Denmark vs Iceland: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Denmark
410.62 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Iceland
432.04 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Denmark rank
45th
Iceland rank
42nd

Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Denmark
  • Iceland
0100200300400500196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 432.04 kilograms per year per capita against 410.62 kilograms per year per capita in Denmark, a difference of 21.42 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 45th and Iceland ranks 42nd of 192 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 111.65 kilograms per year per capita 33.78 kilograms per year per capita 77.87 kilograms per year per capita Denmark
1970s 135.15 kilograms per year per capita 51.32 kilograms per year per capita 83.83 kilograms per year per capita Denmark
1980s 198.84 kilograms per year per capita 81.15 kilograms per year per capita 117.69 kilograms per year per capita Denmark
1990s 214.48 kilograms per year per capita 115.36 kilograms per year per capita 99.12 kilograms per year per capita Denmark
2000s 270.48 kilograms per year per capita 171.65 kilograms per year per capita 98.83 kilograms per year per capita Denmark
2010s 443.72 kilograms per year per capita 369.57 kilograms per year per capita 74.15 kilograms per year per capita Denmark
2020s 430.63 kilograms per year per capita 413.01 kilograms per year per capita 17.63 kilograms per year per capita Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Denmark or Iceland?
Iceland, at 432.04 kilograms per year per capita against 410.62 kilograms per year per capita in Denmark as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Denmark and Iceland?
21.42 kilograms per year per capita, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Iceland rank globally for average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Denmark ranks 45th and Iceland ranks 42nd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Iceland: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/denmark/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/denmark/iceland/">Denmark vs Iceland: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.