Congo vs Zambia: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Congo
36 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Zambia
49.18 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Congo rank
188th
Zambia rank
185th

Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Congo
  • Zambia
406080100120196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 49.18 kilograms per year per capita against 36 kilograms per year per capita in Congo, a difference of 13.18 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.4 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.

Congo ranks 188th and Zambia ranks 185th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 40.5 kilograms per year per capita 87.31 kilograms per year per capita 46.8 kilograms per year per capita Zambia
1970s 41.82 kilograms per year per capita 87.51 kilograms per year per capita 45.69 kilograms per year per capita Zambia
1980s 45.25 kilograms per year per capita 87.51 kilograms per year per capita 42.26 kilograms per year per capita Zambia
1990s 91.97 kilograms per year per capita 75.12 kilograms per year per capita 16.85 kilograms per year per capita Congo
2000s 97.96 kilograms per year per capita 65.65 kilograms per year per capita 32.31 kilograms per year per capita Congo
2010s 80.15 kilograms per year per capita 68.15 kilograms per year per capita 12 kilograms per year per capita Congo
2020s 41.96 kilograms per year per capita 53.57 kilograms per year per capita 11.61 kilograms per year per capita Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Congo or Zambia?
Zambia, at 49.18 kilograms per year per capita against 36 kilograms per year per capita in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Congo and Zambia?
13.18 kilograms per year per capita, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Zambia rank globally for average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Congo ranks 188th and Zambia ranks 185th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Zambia: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/congo-rep/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/congo-rep/zambia/">Congo vs Zambia: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.