Congo vs Madagascar: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Congo
36 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Madagascar
36.94 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Congo rank
188th
Madagascar rank
187th

Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Congo
  • Madagascar
406080100120196119922023

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 36.94 kilograms per year per capita against 36 kilograms per year per capita in Congo, a difference of 0.94 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Madagascar ahead.

Congo ranks 188th and Madagascar ranks 187th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Madagascar in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Madagascar Difference Ahead
1960s 40.5 kilograms per year per capita 94.62 kilograms per year per capita 54.12 kilograms per year per capita Madagascar
1970s 41.82 kilograms per year per capita 87.46 kilograms per year per capita 45.64 kilograms per year per capita Madagascar
1980s 45.25 kilograms per year per capita 73.08 kilograms per year per capita 27.83 kilograms per year per capita Madagascar
1990s 91.97 kilograms per year per capita 60.41 kilograms per year per capita 31.56 kilograms per year per capita Congo
2000s 97.96 kilograms per year per capita 47.33 kilograms per year per capita 50.63 kilograms per year per capita Congo
2010s 80.15 kilograms per year per capita 45.22 kilograms per year per capita 34.93 kilograms per year per capita Congo
2020s 41.96 kilograms per year per capita 37.35 kilograms per year per capita 4.61 kilograms per year per capita Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Congo or Madagascar?
Madagascar, at 36.94 kilograms per year per capita against 36 kilograms per year per capita in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Congo and Madagascar?
0.94 kilograms per year per capita, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Madagascar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Madagascar rank globally for average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Congo ranks 188th and Madagascar ranks 187th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Madagascar: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/congo-rep/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/congo-rep/madagascar/">Congo vs Madagascar: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.