Australia vs Iceland: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Australia
440.1 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Iceland
432.04 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Australia rank
39th
Iceland rank
42nd

Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Australia
  • Iceland
0100200300400500196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 440.1 kilograms per year per capita against 432.04 kilograms per year per capita in Iceland, a difference of 8.06 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 39th and Iceland ranks 42nd of 192 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 175.99 kilograms per year per capita 33.78 kilograms per year per capita 142.21 kilograms per year per capita Australia
1970s 183.75 kilograms per year per capita 51.32 kilograms per year per capita 132.43 kilograms per year per capita Australia
1980s 207 kilograms per year per capita 81.15 kilograms per year per capita 125.85 kilograms per year per capita Australia
1990s 238.66 kilograms per year per capita 115.36 kilograms per year per capita 123.3 kilograms per year per capita Australia
2000s 272.04 kilograms per year per capita 171.65 kilograms per year per capita 100.39 kilograms per year per capita Australia
2010s 435.69 kilograms per year per capita 369.57 kilograms per year per capita 66.13 kilograms per year per capita Australia
2020s 423.28 kilograms per year per capita 413.01 kilograms per year per capita 10.28 kilograms per year per capita Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Australia or Iceland?
Australia, at 440.1 kilograms per year per capita against 432.04 kilograms per year per capita in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Australia and Iceland?
8.06 kilograms per year per capita, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Iceland rank globally for average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Australia ranks 39th and Iceland ranks 42nd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Iceland: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/australia/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/australia/iceland/">Australia vs Iceland: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.