Kazakhstan vs Panama: Average per capita transfer held by 3rd quintile - Contributory Pensio

Kazakhstan
7.63
in 2021
Panama
7.2
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
8th
Panama rank
9th

Average per capita transfer held by 3rd quintile - Contributory Pensio over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Panama
02468200720152023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 7.63 against 7.2 in Panama, a difference of 0.43.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Panama ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 8th and Panama ranks 9th of 32 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Panama Difference Ahead
2010s 5.26 7.31 2.05 Panama
2020s 7.63 7.83 0.199 Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita transfer held by 3rd quintile - contributory pensio, Kazakhstan or Panama?
Kazakhstan, at 7.63 against 7.2 in Panama as of 2021.
What is the difference in average per capita transfer held by 3rd quintile - contributory pensio between Kazakhstan and Panama?
0.43, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Panama?
7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
How do Kazakhstan and Panama rank globally for average per capita transfer held by 3rd quintile - contributory pensio?
Kazakhstan ranks 8th and Panama ranks 9th of 32 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ASPIRE, published as Average per capita transfer held by 3rd quintile - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita transfer held by 3rd quintile - Contributory Pensions -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
33 places, 342 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Average transfer amount of Contributory Pensions programs among program beneficiaries (per capita, daily $ppp)