Ecuador vs South Africa: Average per capita transfer held by 2nd quintile - Contributory
Ecuador
1.92
in 2022
South Africa
2.01
in 2021
Ecuador rank
31st
South Africa rank
29th
Average per capita transfer held by 2nd quintile - Contributory over time
- Ecuador
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 2.01 against 1.92 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Africa ahead.
Ecuador ranks 31st and South Africa ranks 29th of 33 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.2 | 2.41 | 0.2103 | South Africa |
| 2020s | 2.31 | 1.97 | 0.342 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average per capita transfer held by 2nd quintile - contributory, Ecuador or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 2.01 against 1.92 in Ecuador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in average per capita transfer held by 2nd quintile - contributory between Ecuador and South Africa?
- 0.09, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for average per capita transfer held by 2nd quintile - contributory?
- Ecuador ranks 31st and South Africa ranks 29th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Average per capita transfer held by 2nd quintile - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average transfer amount of Contributory Pensions programs among program beneficiaries (per capita, daily $ppp)