Ecuador vs South Africa: Average per capita transfer held by 2nd quintile - Contributory
Ecuador
3.53 preT
in 2022
South Africa
3.61 preT
in 2021
Ecuador rank
23rd
South Africa rank
21st
Average per capita transfer held by 2nd quintile - Contributory over time
- Ecuador
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 3.61 preT against 3.53 preT in Ecuador, a difference of 0.08 preT.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Africa ahead.
Ecuador ranks 23rd and South Africa ranks 21st of 33 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.1 preT | 3.28 preT | 0.1812 preT | South Africa |
| 2020s | 2.74 preT | 3.23 preT | 0.4865 preT | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average per capita transfer held by 2nd quintile - contributory, Ecuador or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 3.61 preT against 3.53 preT in Ecuador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in average per capita transfer held by 2nd quintile - contributory between Ecuador and South Africa?
- 0.08 preT, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for average per capita transfer held by 2nd quintile - contributory?
- Ecuador ranks 23rd and South Africa ranks 21st of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Average per capita transfer held by 2nd quintile - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average transfer amount of Contributory Pensions programs among program beneficiaries (per capita, daily $ppp)