Rwanda vs Uruguay: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Rwanda
272.11 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Uruguay
270.05 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Rwanda rank
66th
Uruguay rank
68th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Rwanda
  • Uruguay
02505007501.0k1.2k196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 272.11 kilograms per year per capita against 270.05 kilograms per year per capita in Uruguay, a difference of 2.06 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 66th and Uruguay ranks 68th of 192 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 1,019 kilograms per year per capita 149.3 kilograms per year per capita 869.71 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
1970s 1,083 kilograms per year per capita 135.18 kilograms per year per capita 947.96 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
1980s 1,057 kilograms per year per capita 163.74 kilograms per year per capita 892.86 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
1990s 860.64 kilograms per year per capita 188.3 kilograms per year per capita 672.33 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
2000s 806.43 kilograms per year per capita 216.07 kilograms per year per capita 590.36 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
2010s 339.55 kilograms per year per capita 234.59 kilograms per year per capita 104.96 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
2020s 265.55 kilograms per year per capita 250.02 kilograms per year per capita 15.53 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Rwanda or Uruguay?
Rwanda, at 272.11 kilograms per year per capita against 270.05 kilograms per year per capita in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Rwanda and Uruguay?
2.06 kilograms per year per capita, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Uruguay rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Rwanda ranks 66th and Uruguay ranks 68th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Uruguay: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/rwanda/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/rwanda/uruguay/">Rwanda vs Uruguay: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.