Philippines vs Rwanda: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Philippines
269.07 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Rwanda
272.11 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Philippines rank
69th
Rwanda rank
66th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Philippines
  • Rwanda
2505007501.0k1.2k196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 272.11 kilograms per year per capita against 269.07 kilograms per year per capita in Philippines, a difference of 3.04 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Philippines ranks 69th and Rwanda ranks 66th of 192 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 232.84 kilograms per year per capita 1,019 kilograms per year per capita 786.17 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
1970s 216.09 kilograms per year per capita 1,083 kilograms per year per capita 867.05 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
1980s 299.54 kilograms per year per capita 1,057 kilograms per year per capita 757.05 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
1990s 284.43 kilograms per year per capita 860.64 kilograms per year per capita 576.2 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
2000s 261.21 kilograms per year per capita 806.43 kilograms per year per capita 545.22 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
2010s 273.86 kilograms per year per capita 339.55 kilograms per year per capita 65.69 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
2020s 247.78 kilograms per year per capita 265.55 kilograms per year per capita 17.76 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Philippines or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 272.11 kilograms per year per capita against 269.07 kilograms per year per capita in Philippines as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Philippines and Rwanda?
3.04 kilograms per year per capita, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Philippines and Rwanda rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Philippines ranks 69th and Rwanda ranks 66th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs Rwanda: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/philippines/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/philippines/rwanda/">Philippines vs Rwanda: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.