Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Namibia
127.11 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Zimbabwe
117.85 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Namibia rank
155th
Zimbabwe rank
158th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Namibia
  • Zimbabwe
50100150200196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 127.11 kilograms per year per capita against 117.85 kilograms per year per capita in Zimbabwe, a difference of 9.26 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 155th and Zimbabwe ranks 158th of 192 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 85.77 kilograms per year per capita 35.73 kilograms per year per capita 50.05 kilograms per year per capita Namibia
1970s 83.72 kilograms per year per capita 33.13 kilograms per year per capita 50.59 kilograms per year per capita Namibia
1980s 80.49 kilograms per year per capita 34.4 kilograms per year per capita 46.09 kilograms per year per capita Namibia
1990s 74.74 kilograms per year per capita 32.97 kilograms per year per capita 41.77 kilograms per year per capita Namibia
2000s 77.47 kilograms per year per capita 36.67 kilograms per year per capita 40.8 kilograms per year per capita Namibia
2010s 153.9 kilograms per year per capita 51.52 kilograms per year per capita 102.39 kilograms per year per capita Namibia
2020s 133.34 kilograms per year per capita 110.67 kilograms per year per capita 22.67 kilograms per year per capita Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Namibia or Zimbabwe?
Namibia, at 127.11 kilograms per year per capita against 117.85 kilograms per year per capita in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Namibia and Zimbabwe?
9.26 kilograms per year per capita, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Zimbabwe rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Namibia ranks 155th and Zimbabwe ranks 158th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/namibia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/namibia/zimbabwe/">Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.