Mongolia vs Senegal: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Mongolia
57.1 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Senegal
53.9 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Mongolia rank
181st
Senegal rank
182nd

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Mongolia
  • Senegal
0255075100196119922023

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 57.1 kilograms per year per capita against 53.9 kilograms per year per capita in Senegal, a difference of 3.2 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Senegal's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Senegal ahead.

Mongolia ranks 181st and Senegal ranks 182nd of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 3 and Senegal in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Senegal Difference Ahead
1960s 6.48 kilograms per year per capita 26.35 kilograms per year per capita 19.86 kilograms per year per capita Senegal
1970s 10.09 kilograms per year per capita 30.73 kilograms per year per capita 20.63 kilograms per year per capita Senegal
1980s 12.86 kilograms per year per capita 34.06 kilograms per year per capita 21.21 kilograms per year per capita Senegal
1990s 14.26 kilograms per year per capita 35.73 kilograms per year per capita 21.46 kilograms per year per capita Senegal
2000s 53.13 kilograms per year per capita 41.77 kilograms per year per capita 11.37 kilograms per year per capita Mongolia
2010s 55.66 kilograms per year per capita 50.21 kilograms per year per capita 5.45 kilograms per year per capita Mongolia
2020s 63.92 kilograms per year per capita 51.74 kilograms per year per capita 12.18 kilograms per year per capita Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Mongolia or Senegal?
Mongolia, at 57.1 kilograms per year per capita against 53.9 kilograms per year per capita in Senegal as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Mongolia and Senegal?
3.2 kilograms per year per capita, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Senegal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mongolia and Senegal rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Mongolia ranks 181st and Senegal ranks 182nd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Senegal: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/mongolia/senegal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/mongolia/senegal/">Mongolia vs Senegal: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.