Mongolia vs Pakistan: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Mongolia
57.1 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Pakistan
65.9 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Mongolia rank
181st
Pakistan rank
178th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Mongolia
  • Pakistan
0255075100196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 65.9 kilograms per year per capita against 57.1 kilograms per year per capita in Mongolia, a difference of 8.8 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Pakistan ahead.

Mongolia ranks 181st and Pakistan ranks 178th of 192 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 6.48 kilograms per year per capita 71.47 kilograms per year per capita 64.99 kilograms per year per capita Pakistan
1970s 10.09 kilograms per year per capita 75.57 kilograms per year per capita 65.48 kilograms per year per capita Pakistan
1980s 12.86 kilograms per year per capita 89.55 kilograms per year per capita 76.69 kilograms per year per capita Pakistan
1990s 14.26 kilograms per year per capita 92.72 kilograms per year per capita 78.46 kilograms per year per capita Pakistan
2000s 53.13 kilograms per year per capita 83.67 kilograms per year per capita 30.54 kilograms per year per capita Pakistan
2010s 55.66 kilograms per year per capita 95.87 kilograms per year per capita 40.21 kilograms per year per capita Pakistan
2020s 63.92 kilograms per year per capita 74.82 kilograms per year per capita 10.91 kilograms per year per capita Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Mongolia or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 65.9 kilograms per year per capita against 57.1 kilograms per year per capita in Mongolia as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Mongolia and Pakistan?
8.8 kilograms per year per capita, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mongolia and Pakistan rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Mongolia ranks 181st and Pakistan ranks 178th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Pakistan: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/mongolia/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/mongolia/pakistan/">Mongolia vs Pakistan: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.