Mexico vs Portugal: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Mexico
376.42 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Portugal
373.24 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Mexico rank
27th
Portugal rank
28th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Mexico
  • Portugal
100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 376.42 kilograms per year per capita against 373.24 kilograms per year per capita in Portugal, a difference of 3.18 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Portugal ahead.

Mexico ranks 27th and Portugal ranks 28th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 3 and Portugal in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s 202.75 kilograms per year per capita 198.58 kilograms per year per capita 4.17 kilograms per year per capita Mexico
1970s 230.14 kilograms per year per capita 175.1 kilograms per year per capita 55.04 kilograms per year per capita Mexico
1980s 276.12 kilograms per year per capita 170.34 kilograms per year per capita 105.78 kilograms per year per capita Mexico
1990s 275.76 kilograms per year per capita 294.37 kilograms per year per capita 18.61 kilograms per year per capita Portugal
2000s 317.96 kilograms per year per capita 318.61 kilograms per year per capita 0.6496 kilograms per year per capita Portugal
2010s 304.86 kilograms per year per capita 343.91 kilograms per year per capita 39.05 kilograms per year per capita Portugal
2020s 351.7 kilograms per year per capita 383.27 kilograms per year per capita 31.57 kilograms per year per capita Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Mexico or Portugal?
Mexico, at 376.42 kilograms per year per capita against 373.24 kilograms per year per capita in Portugal as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Mexico and Portugal?
3.18 kilograms per year per capita, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Portugal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Portugal rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Mexico ranks 27th and Portugal ranks 28th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Portugal: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/mexico/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/mexico/portugal/">Mexico vs Portugal: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.