India vs Tanzania: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

India
179.85 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Tanzania
184.07 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
India rank
127th
Tanzania rank
124th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • India
  • Tanzania
50100150200250196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 184.07 kilograms per year per capita against 179.85 kilograms per year per capita in India, a difference of 4.22 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania ahead.

India ranks 127th and Tanzania ranks 124th of 192 countries.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 72.23 kilograms per year per capita 145.75 kilograms per year per capita 73.52 kilograms per year per capita Tanzania
1970s 69.34 kilograms per year per capita 136.88 kilograms per year per capita 67.55 kilograms per year per capita Tanzania
1980s 74.17 kilograms per year per capita 124.96 kilograms per year per capita 50.8 kilograms per year per capita Tanzania
1990s 90.5 kilograms per year per capita 106.82 kilograms per year per capita 16.31 kilograms per year per capita Tanzania
2000s 108.78 kilograms per year per capita 191.96 kilograms per year per capita 83.18 kilograms per year per capita Tanzania
2010s 154.71 kilograms per year per capita 209.34 kilograms per year per capita 54.62 kilograms per year per capita Tanzania
2020s 175.65 kilograms per year per capita 188.96 kilograms per year per capita 13.32 kilograms per year per capita Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, India or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 184.07 kilograms per year per capita against 179.85 kilograms per year per capita in India as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between India and Tanzania?
4.22 kilograms per year per capita, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do India and Tanzania rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
India ranks 127th and Tanzania ranks 124th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Tanzania: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/india/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/india/tanzania/">India vs Tanzania: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.