Guinea-Bissau vs Namibia: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Guinea-Bissau
127.22 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Namibia
127.11 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
154th
Namibia rank
155th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Namibia
50100150200196119922023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 127.22 kilograms per year per capita against 127.11 kilograms per year per capita in Namibia, a difference of 0.11 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 154th and Namibia ranks 155th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 6 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 137.13 kilograms per year per capita 85.77 kilograms per year per capita 51.36 kilograms per year per capita Guinea-Bissau
1970s 136.76 kilograms per year per capita 83.72 kilograms per year per capita 53.05 kilograms per year per capita Guinea-Bissau
1980s 127.45 kilograms per year per capita 80.49 kilograms per year per capita 46.96 kilograms per year per capita Guinea-Bissau
1990s 150.45 kilograms per year per capita 74.74 kilograms per year per capita 75.71 kilograms per year per capita Guinea-Bissau
2000s 144.91 kilograms per year per capita 77.47 kilograms per year per capita 67.45 kilograms per year per capita Guinea-Bissau
2010s 141.39 kilograms per year per capita 153.9 kilograms per year per capita 12.51 kilograms per year per capita Namibia
2020s 133.91 kilograms per year per capita 133.34 kilograms per year per capita 0.5752 kilograms per year per capita Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Guinea-Bissau or Namibia?
Guinea-Bissau, at 127.22 kilograms per year per capita against 127.11 kilograms per year per capita in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Guinea-Bissau and Namibia?
0.11 kilograms per year per capita, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Namibia rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 154th and Namibia ranks 155th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Namibia: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/guinea-bissau/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/guinea-bissau/namibia/">Guinea-Bissau vs Namibia: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.