Denmark vs Ireland: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Denmark
291.95 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Ireland
292.99 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Denmark rank
58th
Ireland rank
55th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Denmark
  • Ireland
100200300400500196119922023

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 292.99 kilograms per year per capita against 291.95 kilograms per year per capita in Denmark, a difference of 1.04 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 58th and Ireland ranks 55th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 4 and Ireland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Ireland Difference Ahead
1960s 172.13 kilograms per year per capita 127.34 kilograms per year per capita 44.79 kilograms per year per capita Denmark
1970s 180.41 kilograms per year per capita 139.47 kilograms per year per capita 40.94 kilograms per year per capita Denmark
1980s 169.92 kilograms per year per capita 173.86 kilograms per year per capita 3.94 kilograms per year per capita Ireland
1990s 208.61 kilograms per year per capita 181.76 kilograms per year per capita 26.85 kilograms per year per capita Denmark
2000s 340.14 kilograms per year per capita 317.27 kilograms per year per capita 22.87 kilograms per year per capita Denmark
2010s 281.8 kilograms per year per capita 416.39 kilograms per year per capita 134.58 kilograms per year per capita Ireland
2020s 290.48 kilograms per year per capita 312.98 kilograms per year per capita 22.5 kilograms per year per capita Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Denmark or Ireland?
Ireland, at 292.99 kilograms per year per capita against 291.95 kilograms per year per capita in Denmark as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Denmark and Ireland?
1.04 kilograms per year per capita, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Ireland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Ireland rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Denmark ranks 58th and Ireland ranks 55th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Ireland: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/denmark/ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/denmark/ireland/">Denmark vs Ireland: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.