Congo vs Zimbabwe: Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines
Congo
114.26
in 2023
Zimbabwe
117.85
in 2023
Congo rank
160th
Zimbabwe rank
158th
Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines over time
- Congo
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 117.85 against 114.26 in Congo, a difference of 3.59.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 160th and Zimbabwe ranks 158th of 192 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 122.54 | 35.73 | 86.81 | Congo |
| 1970s | 127.27 | 33.13 | 94.14 | Congo |
| 1980s | 144.47 | 34.4 | 110.08 | Congo |
| 1990s | 161.62 | 32.97 | 128.65 | Congo |
| 2000s | 160.17 | 36.67 | 123.51 | Congo |
| 2010s | 134.64 | 51.52 | 83.13 | Congo |
| 2020s | 117.97 | 110.67 | 7.3 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines, Congo or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 117.85 against 114.26 in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines between Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 3.59, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines?
- Congo ranks 160th and Zimbabwe ranks 158th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.