Cambodia vs Mongolia: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Cambodia
48.55 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Mongolia
57.1 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Cambodia rank
183rd
Mongolia rank
181st

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Cambodia
  • Mongolia
0255075100125196119922023

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 57.1 kilograms per year per capita against 48.55 kilograms per year per capita in Cambodia, a difference of 8.55 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.2 times Cambodia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 183rd and Mongolia ranks 181st of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 6 and Mongolia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Mongolia Difference Ahead
1960s 107.22 kilograms per year per capita 6.48 kilograms per year per capita 100.73 kilograms per year per capita Cambodia
1970s 71.43 kilograms per year per capita 10.09 kilograms per year per capita 61.34 kilograms per year per capita Cambodia
1980s 75.88 kilograms per year per capita 12.86 kilograms per year per capita 63.03 kilograms per year per capita Cambodia
1990s 74.34 kilograms per year per capita 14.26 kilograms per year per capita 60.07 kilograms per year per capita Cambodia
2000s 70.6 kilograms per year per capita 53.13 kilograms per year per capita 17.47 kilograms per year per capita Cambodia
2010s 60.66 kilograms per year per capita 55.66 kilograms per year per capita 5 kilograms per year per capita Cambodia
2020s 42.4 kilograms per year per capita 63.92 kilograms per year per capita 21.52 kilograms per year per capita Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Cambodia or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 57.1 kilograms per year per capita against 48.55 kilograms per year per capita in Cambodia as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Cambodia and Mongolia?
8.55 kilograms per year per capita, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Mongolia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Mongolia rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Cambodia ranks 183rd and Mongolia ranks 181st of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Mongolia: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/cambodia/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/cambodia/mongolia/">Cambodia vs Mongolia: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.