Australia vs Germany: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Australia
235.86 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Germany
237.5 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Australia rank
90th
Germany rank
89th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Australia
  • Germany
0100200300196119922023

How they compare

Germany currently reports 237.5 kilograms per year per capita against 235.86 kilograms per year per capita in Australia, a difference of 1.64 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Germany ahead.

Australia ranks 90th and Germany ranks 89th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Germany in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Germany Difference Ahead
1960s 223.52 kilograms per year per capita 259.7 kilograms per year per capita 36.19 kilograms per year per capita Germany
1970s 234.97 kilograms per year per capita 288.13 kilograms per year per capita 53.16 kilograms per year per capita Germany
1980s 237.75 kilograms per year per capita 293.46 kilograms per year per capita 55.7 kilograms per year per capita Germany
1990s 240.96 kilograms per year per capita 262.19 kilograms per year per capita 21.23 kilograms per year per capita Germany
2000s 277.03 kilograms per year per capita 249.5 kilograms per year per capita 27.53 kilograms per year per capita Australia
2010s 243.64 kilograms per year per capita 252.62 kilograms per year per capita 8.98 kilograms per year per capita Germany
2020s 223.1 kilograms per year per capita 255.47 kilograms per year per capita 32.37 kilograms per year per capita Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Australia or Germany?
Germany, at 237.5 kilograms per year per capita against 235.86 kilograms per year per capita in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Australia and Germany?
1.64 kilograms per year per capita, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Germany?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Germany rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Australia ranks 90th and Germany ranks 89th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Germany: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/australia/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/australia/germany/">Australia vs Germany: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.