Angola vs Hungary: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Angola
225.83 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Hungary
222.65 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Angola rank
97th
Hungary rank
99th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Angola
  • Hungary
50100150200250196119922023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 225.83 kilograms per year per capita against 222.65 kilograms per year per capita in Hungary, a difference of 3.18 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

Angola ranks 97th and Hungary ranks 99th of 192 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Hungary Difference Ahead
1960s 136.93 kilograms per year per capita 161.61 kilograms per year per capita 24.68 kilograms per year per capita Hungary
1970s 130.59 kilograms per year per capita 182.07 kilograms per year per capita 51.48 kilograms per year per capita Hungary
1980s 105.28 kilograms per year per capita 181.51 kilograms per year per capita 76.23 kilograms per year per capita Hungary
1990s 78.07 kilograms per year per capita 177.85 kilograms per year per capita 99.78 kilograms per year per capita Hungary
2000s 119.87 kilograms per year per capita 204.32 kilograms per year per capita 84.45 kilograms per year per capita Hungary
2010s 185.87 kilograms per year per capita 191.1 kilograms per year per capita 5.23 kilograms per year per capita Hungary
2020s 211.9 kilograms per year per capita 225.9 kilograms per year per capita 13.99 kilograms per year per capita Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Angola or Hungary?
Angola, at 225.83 kilograms per year per capita against 222.65 kilograms per year per capita in Hungary as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Angola and Hungary?
3.18 kilograms per year per capita, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Hungary?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Hungary rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Angola ranks 97th and Hungary ranks 99th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Hungary: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/angola/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/angola/hungary/">Angola vs Hungary: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.