Afghanistan vs Congo: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Afghanistan
109.38 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Congo
114.26 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
163rd
Congo rank
160th

Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Congo
50100150200196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 114.26 kilograms per year per capita against 109.38 kilograms per year per capita in Afghanistan, a difference of 4.88 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 163rd and Congo ranks 160th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 126.23 kilograms per year per capita 122.54 kilograms per year per capita 3.69 kilograms per year per capita Afghanistan
1970s 107.51 kilograms per year per capita 127.27 kilograms per year per capita 19.76 kilograms per year per capita Congo
1980s 81.25 kilograms per year per capita 144.47 kilograms per year per capita 63.22 kilograms per year per capita Congo
1990s 86.03 kilograms per year per capita 161.62 kilograms per year per capita 75.59 kilograms per year per capita Congo
2000s 62.9 kilograms per year per capita 160.17 kilograms per year per capita 97.27 kilograms per year per capita Congo
2010s 93.39 kilograms per year per capita 134.64 kilograms per year per capita 41.26 kilograms per year per capita Congo
2020s 106.64 kilograms per year per capita 117.97 kilograms per year per capita 11.33 kilograms per year per capita Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Afghanistan or Congo?
Congo, at 114.26 kilograms per year per capita against 109.38 kilograms per year per capita in Afghanistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Afghanistan and Congo?
4.88 kilograms per year per capita, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Congo rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Afghanistan ranks 163rd and Congo ranks 160th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Congo: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/afghanistan/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-fruit-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/afghanistan/congo-rep/">Afghanistan vs Congo: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.