Sri Lanka vs Suriname: Average non-HDL cholesterol levels
Sri Lanka
3.3
in 2018
Suriname
3.3
in 2018
Sri Lanka rank
95th
Suriname rank
95th
Average non-HDL cholesterol levels over time
- Sri Lanka
- Suriname
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 3.3 against 3.3 in Suriname, a difference of 0.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 95th and Suriname ranks 95th of 191 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 2.8 | 3.5 | 0.7 | Suriname |
| 1990s | 2.95 | 3.45 | 0.5 | Suriname |
| 2000s | 3.13 | 3.4 | 0.27 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 3.28 | 3.34 | 0.0667 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average non-hdl cholesterol levels, Sri Lanka or Suriname?
- Sri Lanka, at 3.3 against 3.3 in Suriname as of 2018.
- What is the difference in average non-hdl cholesterol levels between Sri Lanka and Suriname?
- 0, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Suriname?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2018.
- How do Sri Lanka and Suriname rank globally for average non-hdl cholesterol levels?
- Sri Lanka ranks 95th and Suriname ranks 95th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization - Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Average non-HDL cholesterol levels. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The estimated average level of non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol, commonly known as "bad cholesterol". Healthy levels are considered to be under 4mmol/L. Elevated levels of non-HDL cholesterol are a risk factor for chronic complications, including cardiovascular disease, and premature death.